ring, lord of the rings, hobbit

YOLO, Tolkien and Wealth

Canadian rapper Drake is credited with popularizing the term “YOLO,” an acronym for “you only live once.” It’s meant to inspire people to throw caution to the wind and seek adventure by following their whims. Carpe Diem!

I’m not into rap, but I can still remember the way Schlitz beer captured the same concept in 1971.  They told us “You only go round once in life, so grab for all the gusto!”  To remember that phrase after 50 years says something about the enduring power of the message.

What interests me about these two popular phases is the implications for your finances. They are bold metaphysical assertions that when you die, that’s it. Nothing more. If you believe YOLO, does it make any difference in how you handle money? Or, if you hold to religious beliefs of a hereafter, does it make any difference in how you manage your finances?

Personal finance bloggers like me look at just about every dimension of how we handle our money. We write on everything from the best financial tactics to cognitive biases and psychological money disorders. But probably because religion is pretty touchy to discuss in polite company, many advisors tend to ignore it. And yet, we know that religious beliefs, or lack of them, can have a tremendous influence on how we think about and manage our life and money. So, I am going to give it a shot in today’s post.

Let me start to answer those questions with a story of how a literary giant said no to YOLO and finished his greatest work as a result.

Tolkien’s Answer to YOLO

Everyone has heard of J.R.R. Tolkien because of his incredible books The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit. But I’ve seldom talked to anyone that is aware of his short story with the title Leaf by Niggle.” It was written during World War II when Tolkien was half way through writing Lord of the Rings.

Tolkien was in despair that he would never complete his life work. He was 50 years old and had experienced firsthand the horrors of World War I. England was likely to be invaded and he had many doubts he would survive. This stress had weighed on him and the thought of not finishing was a dreadful and numbing thought. He was without the mental energy to continue.

The Leaf by Niggle story is only 10 pages long. I hope you’ll read it. The protagonist, Niggle, was a struggling artist. He found frustration in his work just like we all do. And death (a train he was forced to board) came calling before he had completed his masterpiece landscape painting.

But rather than end in death, Niggle is transported to a new country. There he finds the results of his work in full detail and finished. His work had not died with him, but was a part of the new reality. To paraphrase St. Paul, “His labor was not in vain.”

Tolkien steadied himself by writing this story because it’s grounded in a Christian understanding of reality. The reality of life after death. With new inspiration, he completed his books in a dark time. His books are recognized as the work of a genius. But we now know the books may never have been completed without the hope he found in his own story.

Can you imagine if the writers club Tolkien belonged to called “The Inklings” held a YOLO worldview? I can see Tolkien counseling C.S. Lewis, “Lewis, chill man! Forget about finishing that Narnia tale and grab another brew. YOLO buddy!” Okay, maybe not, but you get my point. 

Evidence that Religion Creates Affluence

Max Weber was a German economist who wrote a book called The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. The book looked closely at religion and its impact on how we manage our money.  It’s not an easy read, but it has been cited as one of the most important books of the 20th century.

In short, Weber found dramatic increases in affluence in those countries that embraced the religious beliefs of the Reformation. Why? For one, there was a dramatic shift of human and financial capital in those countries away from building churches, and into secular pursuits.

So, why would an intensely religious movement produce economic secularization? The beginning of capitalism out of religion?  Because of a radical realization that all of life was sacred. It wasn’t just the clergy that served God and man.

The baker who made bread was used to answer the prayer “Give us this day our daily bread.” Perhaps the baker should reinvest his profits in his business then, rather than give it all to the church. This new way of thinking changed everything.

The freedom to move resources away from building bigger and bigger cathedrals and into business pursuits created prosperity.  Savings and investment were no longer seen as a threat to the soul, but a means to create human flourishing through business. The world would never be the same.

Personal finance: YOLO versus Christian

Today the conflict is not between Catholics and Protestants. Rather, the lines are drawn more between the YOLO believers and those who continue to hold to the economic teachings that came out of the reformation. The Spirit of Capitalism. Here are four areas that compare and contrast the two worldviews.

First, frugal living, or conservation, was a part of the Reformation mindset along with the virtue of making a profit. Living below one’s means with contentment guaranteed wealth would be accumulated. This religious influence against signaling our growing affluence through possessions is incorporated into much personal finance teaching today.  Whether it’s FIRE, Suze Orman or Dave Ramsey, there is wide agreement that frugality, combined with growing your income, is the way to prosperity.  YOLO?  They are not too much into saying no to desires.

Second, the YOLO adherents might be surprised to find a rich Christian tradition of celebration and joyful living. I love the concept of the rejoicing tithe in the Old Testament. This tithe required the Israelites to spend a sizeable portion of their income on rejoicing feasts. Remembering this practice is a way to protect against the joyless accumulation of wealth that crushes the soul. Perhaps there is common ground with YOLO here.

Third, Max Weber was skeptical that a truly religious life could be lived while holding earthly treasures. The monastic life free of money was seen as the way of holiness. What he failed to appreciate was the ability to see wealth as something we manage as stewards for God, and not as owners. John Wesley, founder of the Methodist church, summarized a Christian view of wealth, “Make all you can, save all you can, give all you can.” I suspect YOLO adherents see any money coming into their life as useful mostly for hedonistic pursuits.

Finally, the Christian tradition of charity flowing from our excess wealth did not change with the Reformation. While more people are helped today by a thriving economy than through charity, the need for charitable gifts remains a vital part of religion. In fact, charitable giving was almost unknown in the Roman empire. The Christians began to practice charity to the amazement of the Romans. That practice has now penetrated most of the world and I would expect many YOLO adherents also share this charitable instinct.

This is a very fertile topic with much more that could be said, but it’s time to hit the send button. However, I’d love to extend the discussion through you. If you are religious, I’d love to know how you connect the dots from your faith to your money. And if you’re not, I would enjoy hearing from you on what beliefs impact your views of how you manage your money.

Joe Kesler

 Smart Money with Purpose

12 thoughts on “YOLO, Tolkien and Wealth”

  1. I’m so thankful this particular blog title caught my eye early this Saturday morning as I scrolled through my inbox. What an informed and inspiring post. My parents were both products of the great depression, and instilled in me from an early age the practice of living beneath one’s means and wasting nothing. I saw them save over the years on very meager wages, and ultimately to send me to college (first one in the family). I also watched them write out the check each month to our church, and to generously give of whatever they had (be it garden produce, extra cash, clothing, etc.). One of the, if not THE best things about having more than enough is being able to give and share. I sweat the pennies (to my wife’s 30 year+ chagrin) so that the dollars accumulate. And it’s such a blessing to us to be able to step up and help whether that be at church or in our family/community. And we firmly believe that we know from whence all these blessings have their genesis. And so we gratefully acknowledge, “All things come of THEE, oh Lord, and of THINE own have we given THEE”. And now “Leaf By Niggle” has moved up onto my “to-do list”. I thank you again for this post.

    1. Ronnie, Thanks for sharing some of your story! And it’s a great story too. Lives lived out like yours and your parents are so purposeful and rewarding they are an inspiration to all of us. Thanks again!

  2. Joe – One influence I think Weber overlooked was that Calvinism was born during the Little Ice Age. It was a matter of life or death in Northern Europe to “live beneath your means” and “store up nuts for the winter.” This was not so much a problem in the Mediterranean Catholic and Orthodox countries of Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain (the P.I.I.G.S.). Also, I think you have to remember that Martin Luther’s openhanded generosity was often a source of frustration to his sweet wife, Katie. In her own way Katie was a crypto Calvinist in the way she tried to bring good sense and order to their life together. Good article. I appreciate the way you think.
    Dave Baese

  3. Rodney Stark, in his book, The Triumph of Christianity, documents that ideas within Christianity were at the roots of far more advances than just financial. Areas such as scientific discoveries, improved treatment of women and children, the fight against slavery, advancement of education, improved care of the physically ill. and on and on we could go can all be traced to adherents of the Christian faith.

  4. Joe, I’ve often thought about how having little to start with drives such opposite behaviors. One person grows up with little and passes on to their kids the importance of being thrifty with the little they have. Another passes on the YOLO concept. My grandparents were very thrifty by necessity. Yet they taught us the joy in living a life where money has only a minor role to bring to the celebration. What we (my wife & I) now consider “simple” pleasures bring as much or more meaning to our lives then the extravagant pleasures we have enjoyed. For example, a family bar b q (we call them potluck feasts) or family camping trip bring our lives the greatest joy vs. a cruise or weekend in the San Juans! Relationships are invaluable in our lives. Paul said he had learned to be content in all things. That has always struck me as an admirable goal. I think the YOLO concept may work for some people as long as they can enjoy it for all seasons of life. Simple, low cost things that still bring us the most joy are, family/friend celebrations, helping others, reading, hobbies, listening to music, making music, hiking, biking, baking!! All can be enjoyed for little or next to nothing. Thank you for the thought provoking article.

    1. Great thoughts Brian! I think the YOLO folks sometimes live in constant fear that they will miss out on something. You’re post is a great testimony to the lifestyle that finds joy in whatever situation we find ourselves in without any stress worrying about what we might be missing. It sounds like you inherited a wonderful heritage and I appreciate you sharing that wisdom.

  5. Stephen A Hoogerhyde

    Joe,
    What a great article! Well done!
    I think the basic problem with YOLO is the first word: you. The emphasis is entirely on the individual. But we were not created to live for ourselves. The concept of stewardship, that we have been given life, gifts, talents, opportunities, and yes, wealth, by God to be used in service to him and to our fellow man as well as ourselves, is a necessary corrective to YOLO.

    John Calvin, in commenting on the eighth commandment (you shall not steal), said this: “In its substance, then, the commandment forbids us to long after other men’s goods, and, accordingly, requires every man to exert himself honestly in preserving his own. For we must consider, that what each individual possesses has not fallen to him by chance, but by the distribution of the sovereign Lord of all, that no one can pervert his means to bad purposes without committing a fraud on a divine dispensation.” In other words, don’t just refrain from stealing from others; be diligent to protect what God has entrusted to you.

    Furthermore, as Johannes Vos wrote on the same subject, “Property or wealth is created by God and entrusted to man for his use in glorifying and serving God. It is therefore a stewardship committed to man, and for this reason must be respected. Thus the eighth commandment requires not only that we refrain from stealing our neighbor’s property, but that we acquire and take care of our own.” Again we see the concept of stewardship.

    YOLO? No. Rather, faithful stewardship reaps benefits, for now and the life to come.

    1. Thanks Steve! I can’t think of a better way to get to the heart of the Reformation teaching on wealth than to look at what Calvin had to say. Great wisdom there. thanks for finding some great insights into his views on this subject. Calvin versus YOLO? I think that’s an unfair fight! Appreciate the great insightful comments.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top